government apologizes for failure to provide evidence for lockdown party claims, The Guardian
‘Not the right time’: China steps back from Russia-Ukraine war, Al Jazeera
How to talk to kids about addiction, The New York Times
How to make a case for remote work to your boss, The Wall Street Journal
Why do some people never get COVID-19? The answer could be in their genes, National Geographic
Early results from a phase 3 clinical trial of a new oral COVID-19 treatment show that it can significantly reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. The drug, called molnupiravir, is an antiviral that works by introducing errors into the genetic material of the virus, preventing it from replicating. The trial involved more than 700 people who were at high risk of severe disease, and the results are so promising that the trial is being stopped early so that all participants can receive the drug. Read more about the study and its implications in this article.
That’s it for today. Thanks for reading, and have a great weekend.
The recent ruling by the high court stating that trans women do not meet the definition of women under equalities law has sparked a heated debate and raised concerns about the rights of transgender individuals. The decision, which was made by the UK Supreme Court, has been met with both support and criticism from various groups.
According to NPR, the court’s ruling has significant implications for the transgender community, as it could impact their ability to access certain rights and protections afforded to women under equalities law. The decision has also raised questions about the broader definition of gender and how it is legally defined.
Many advocates for transgender rights have expressed outrage over the ruling, arguing that it is discriminatory and goes against the principles of equality and inclusivity. They believe that trans women should be recognized as women in all aspects of society, including under equalities law.
On the other hand, some critics of the ruling have applauded the court for upholding traditional views of gender and for maintaining the distinction between biological sex and gender identity. They argue that the ruling is a necessary step to preserve the rights and protections of women under equalities law.
In light of this ruling, it is crucial for policymakers and lawmakers to carefully consider the implications of their decisions on the rights and freedoms of all individuals, regardless of their gender identity. It is important to ensure that all individuals are treated with dignity and respect, and that their rights are protected under the law.
As the debate over transgender rights continues to unfold, it is essential for society to have open and honest conversations about gender identity, equality, and inclusivity. Only through dialogue and understanding can we truly create a more just and equitable society for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.
