There are pads and tampons in Wyomissing Area High School in eastern Pennsylvania. But it’s complicated to obtain them, according to Karla Aguay, a sophomore.
If you don’t have anything on hand, and your friend doesn’t, you either need a quarter for a dispenser in a bathroom. Or you have to go to the nurse’s office and request free ones.
“It should be more accessible,” Karla said. “In the bathroom, they should have the supplies they have at the nurse, just in the bathroom [at no cost]. It just takes time getting to the nurse’s office, going to the bathroom, going back.”
Aguay and her friends usually carry, and share, the products they bring from home, she said. But there are some students whose families can’t afford products at home, and are limited to what the school provides, as well as the complications in the way.
Aguay’s home state of Pennsylvania could be the next to dedicate millions of dollars for schools to provide menstrual hygiene products for students, with advocates arguing access to the materials could keep the students who lack access to the products in classrooms—a particularly pressing concern for educators trying to make up ground after COVID-19.
The legislation, which would establish a $3 million grant through the state’s education department for low-income school districts, passed the Democratic-controlled state House earlier this month, with all Democrats voting favorably, joined by more than a dozen Republicans. It goes on to the GOP-controlled Senate.
The funding would come at a time when more students are chronically absent. Studies show that students from low-income families were some of the hardest hit by in-person learning disruptions during COVID-19 pandemic closures. Researchers say that having menstrual products accessible in schools will keep low-income students, struggling with period poverty, in class.
“Students might be going through their day using a sock or a wad of toilet paper to make it through the school day,” said Lacey Gero, director of government relations for the Alliance for Period Supplies, a program from the National Diaper Bank Network that does period advocacy work and distributes products and funding to support access to period products. “No student should have to think about if their proxy item is failing them, or where their next product will come from.”
Should the measure pass both chambers, Pennsylvania would join at least 27 other states and the District of Columbia in requiring stocking of free products at schools or providing funding to stock them, according to data collected by the Alliance for Period Supplies. Laws vary for what grades and schools should stock products, sometimes extending to include elementary schools.
What happens when students don’t have products in school
When students don’t have access to the products, they report missing school, coming late, or leaving early, according to a 2019 study. Lack of access affects their ability to learn in class, too, said Christopher Cotropia, a professor of law at the University of Richmond, who authored the study.
Even for schools that provide pads and tampons, the study found that sometimes students need to pay. But often many schools have so-called “gatekeepers,” he said: Front office administrators or school nurses. Students reported feeling embarrassed having to ask, he said.
Karla, who is a youth advisor with Girl Up, a girl-centered leadership development initiative, said that even she feels awkward sometimes asking for the supplies at the nurse’s office if there are other people around.
It’s similar at Cameron Vroman’s school, Norwell High, in Massachusetts, where she said she’s fortunate that her school stocks supplies, even though the state doesn’t require schools to have pads and tampons, nor does it make funding for them available directly to districts.
She helped distribute dots for teachers to stick on their doors, indicating they have period products in their classrooms, so students don’t have to walk down to the nurse’s office—which is out of the way and time-consuming, leading to missed class time, she said.
She and her mother, Susan Vroman, are volunteers for Free., an organization that distributes period products to schools throughout the state. Working with Free., Cameron and her mom have been proponents of legislation that would expand access to menstrual products in schools, as well as homeless shelters and prisons. The bill passed the state Senate unanimously, but hasn’t been taken up by the state House. Democrats control both chambers.
Cameron, who is finishing up her sophomore year, has stuffed envelopes, collected petition signatures, and done club outreach to advocate for passage.
“I think we should all be fighting for this, personally,” she said. “I don’t think anyone should have to choose between food, bills, and products people need daily.”
Stocking the pads and tampons in schools, in public, non-restricted spaces like bathrooms, could have a “spillover” effect, the University of Richmond’s Cotropia said.
“If you provide products for free or they’re easier to access, then maybe this individual—and this is a feature, not a bug—can take some home, so they’re able to get needs met while at school and at home,” he said. “That can help education as well—homework, or studying; they’re getting basic needs met to have the ability to do that.”
Often, legislation garners bipartisan support
That is sometimes where the partisan divide comes in. While period product bills have passed unanimously or with bipartisan support in some legislatures, there can be sticking points with earmarking funding. But there’s sometimes better “political economy” to provide social services through schools instead of subsidizing the products altogether for everyone, said Cotropia.
In Pennsylvania, state Republican Rep. Stephanie Borowicz criticized the bill on the floor as a Democratic attempt to “provide everything for you.”
Roughly 11 states require period products in schools without offering funding for them. That leads to an uneven uptake between schools with greater resources and funding and those with tighter budgets, Cotropia said.
Virginia, which passed its legislation in 2022, did so without funding.
Holly Seibold, a Democratic delegate, has been advocating for years to get funds added to the budget to provide menstrual products in schools. Despite her efforts, she continues to hear stories about schools not stocking bathrooms with these essential items.
According to Seibold, in poorer districts, it often falls on school boards to find the money to fund menstrual products, creating an additional burden on already tight budgets. This can be especially challenging for schools that serve populations in need of these products the most. However, opponents argue that providing pads and tampons may lead to wastage, as they are considered expensive.
Advocates for menstrual equity argue that funding can help close the gaps in access to menstrual products. In Pennsylvania, a proposed measure would allocate $3 million in grants for public schools where a quarter of the student population is eligible for free or reduced-cost lunch. Several states provide funding for schools to purchase pads and tampons, but without a mandate for access. In North Carolina, where funds are distributed on a first-come-first-served basis, the demand often exceeds the available funds.
According to a recent report, states that have provided funding in the budget along with a mandated requirement have seen more successful implementations, with students having consistent access to products. Dr. Bhuchitra Singh from the Alliance for Period Supplies emphasizes the importance of schools in addressing students’ health needs. Providing menstrual products not only increases access to safe products but also serves as an avenue for education on menstruation and destigmatizing periods.
Period products are taxed in about 20 states, adding to the financial burden on individuals who cannot afford them. Singh highlights the inequity in access to period products, noting that those with lower incomes often have to choose between buying these products or having food for themselves and their families.
Overall, the push for funding menstrual products in schools is rooted in the belief that access to these essential items is a basic human right. By providing these products in schools, educators can support students’ health, well-being, and academic success.
